Skip to content
Get a Demo
All Workbenches
Network Governance · Discrepancy NE-0334
IllustrativeReviewer: A. ParkPending review
Evidence: photo · IMU · GPS Source: Field Ops · CRW-04 Captured 2026-05-19 09:14 · 38m ago
System Truth (Smallworld)
Asset IDXFR-44-1187
TypeDistribution transformer
PhaseSingle - A
Rated kVA50
Pole mountPOLE 24-117B
Install year1998
Field-Reported · Awaiting decision
Asset IDXFR-44-1187
TypeDistribution transformer
PhaseThree-phase - A/B/C
Rated kVA50
Pole mountPOLE 24-118A
Install year1998

System truth changes when someone with authority says so.

The governance surface for office reviewers. Evidence beside system truth. Approve, reject, request more information, or investigate. Authoritative editing stays where it already lives, and write-back happens with a name attached.

  • Source, version, and confidence travel with every record.
  • Approval is a decision, not a button. Every disposition is durable and auditable.
  • Coexists with Smallworld and Esri, which stay the system of record.

What it does before the model changes.

Network Governance is built for review and disposition, with provenance attached. Freehand map editing stays in Smallworld and Esri, on purpose.

Discrepancy queue

Field-reported deltas, ranked by impact and age. Aging work doesn't get hidden behind a "tickets" tab.

Side-by-side diff

System truth on one side, field evidence on the other, changed fields highlighted. Most decisions take a few seconds.

Approve, reject, investigate

Four constrained dispositions. Every choice is durable, attributed, and reversible with a trail.

Provenance front-and-center

Source, version, capture time, evidence type, visible at decision time. No more "where did this come from?"

Governed write-back

Approved updates flow back to Smallworld or Esri through the bridge. The system of record stays the system of record.

"Request more info"

Loop the field back in when the evidence isn't enough. The crew sees the question on the device, on the pole, in context.

Who governs the model.

Network model integrity has multiple layers. Network Governance respects that.

Reviewer

The Office Reviewer

Evaluates evidence, dispositions discrepancies. The product's most important user, earn this trust first.

Steward

The GIS Integrity Steward

Owns model correctness and QA/QC. Sees deeper detail, accesses the audit trail.

Analyst

The Tech Analyst

Understands how GIS, OMS, AMI, and work systems interact operationally. Diagnoses cross-system mismatches.

Admin

The Network Drafter

Performs authoritative editing in Smallworld or Esri. Sees the approved updates arrive cleanly.

Where the work comes from

Pilot to Production

Pick one feeder. Govern it cleanly.

One feeder, one reviewer, one cycle. Measure time-to-disposition and model drift. Decide from there.